That doesn't really prove anything. I'm not a border control freak but that could just as easily be evidence that more people were getting through without being caught.
But brown Ebola infested revolutionary child soldiers working for ISIS get a free pass in your warped version of logical consistency
Um, what? First of all, as I implied in the post you quoted, I don't really care if people are coming illegally. I'm just pointing out that Jfern's statistic isn't necessarily evidence that fewer illegal crossings are occurring. Even if I did believe that a bunch ebola-infested terrorists were coming over (which I don't and never said and I'm guessing you just assumed out of nowhere to pretend to be offended) how would that be logically inconsistent with suggesting that Jfern's statistic isn't really proof of fewer illegal crossings.