White privilege and 12 Years A Slave (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 05:18:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  White privilege and 12 Years A Slave (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: White privilege and 12 Years A Slave  (Read 3266 times)
Deus Naturae
Deus naturae
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,637
Croatia


« on: January 26, 2014, 10:04:40 PM »

It doesn't sound that Stevens was denying that that stuff actually happened, just questioning whether emphasizing the sheer gruesomeness/violence/sexual horror of it is the best way to communicate the intended message. I haven't seen the movie, so I don't now if that is at all true.
Logged
Deus Naturae
Deus naturae
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,637
Croatia


« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2014, 10:44:53 PM »

It doesn't sound that Stevens was denying that that stuff actually happened, just questioning whether emphasizing the sheer gruesomeness/violence/sexual horror of it is the best way to communicate the intended message. I haven't seen the movie, so I don't now if that is at all true.
The point of the gruesomeness is to emphasize the horrors of slavery.
I realize that. I think that the point that Stevenson is trying to make is that those tactics (that is, emphasis on physical violence) might not necessarily be the best way to get the viewer to consider the theme(s) of the film.
Logged
Deus Naturae
Deus naturae
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,637
Croatia


« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2014, 11:30:07 PM »

It doesn't sound that Stevens was denying that that stuff actually happened, just questioning whether emphasizing the sheer gruesomeness/violence/sexual horror of it is the best way to communicate the intended message. I haven't seen the movie, so I don't now if that is at all true.
The point of the gruesomeness is to emphasize the horrors of slavery.
I realize that. I think that the point that Stevenson is trying to make is that those tactics (that is, emphasis on physical violence) might not necessarily be the best way to get the viewer to consider the theme(s) of the film.
Why not, exactly? To emphasize the horrors of slavery, the movie emphasizes the gruesomeness of it, which is actually realistic in this case. It's not necessarily exaggeration; the goal is to show how awful it really was, no holes barred.
As I said, I haven't seen the movie, so I can't affirm or deny Stevens's claim. However, I do think it is possible for a film to focus too much on "guts and gore" at the expense of the deeper meaning, even if said gore is realistic.

If the film was intended to be a documentary, then making it as realistic as possible would be the only concern. However, if it was intended to be a deeply meaningful film (as I'm sure it was), then potentially distracting elements (such as an excessive focus on physical violence or quasi-pornographic scenes) might be worth considering removing.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 10 queries.