Alabama: None.
Alaska: Byron Mallott (D)
Arizona: Fred DuVal (D)
Arkansas: Josh Drake (G)
California: Jerry Brown (D)
Colorado: John Hickenlooper (D)
Connecticut: Dan Malloy (D)
Florida: Charlie Crist (D)
Georgia: Jason Carter (D)
Hawaii: Neil Abercrombie (D)
Idaho: John Bujak (L)
Illinois: Pat Quinn (D)
Iowa: Jack Hatch (D)
Kansas: Paul Davis (D)
Maine: Eliot Cutler (I)
Maryland: Heather Mizeur (D)
Massachusetts: Donald Berwick (D)
Michigan: Mark Schauer (D)
Minnesota: Mark Dayton (DFL)
Nebraska: Mark Elworth (L)
Nevada: Brian Sandoval (R)
New Hampshire: Andrew Hemingway (R)
New Mexico: None.
New York: Jimmy McMillan (RITDH)
Ohio: Ed FitzGerald (Very reluctantly) (D)
Oklahoma: Joe Dorman (D)
Oregon: John Kitzhaber (D)
Pennsylvania: Tom Wolf (D)
Rhode Island: None.
South Carolina: Steve French (L)
South Dakota: Susan Wismer (D)
Tennessee: I truly can't find much about any of the candidates other than Haslam, they are all nobodies to the core.
Texas: Wendy Davis (D)
Vermont: Peter Shumlin (D)
Wisconsin: Mary Burke (D)
Wyoming: Pete Gosar (D)
You know he's the Tea Partier in the race, right?
I can't forgive Hassan for threatening to veto marijuana legalization.
Right I figured that, so I'd understand no endorsement, one of Hassan's no-name primary challengers, one of the no-name candidates in the Republican primary, a third party candidate if there are any, or Walt Havenstein, the frontrunner for the Republican primary and the more mainstream/moderate of the two. But why Hemingway, the Tea Partier? Just because he supports medical marijuana more than Hassan does? I'm sorry if I sound aggressive, but you must be able to see why this makes very little sense to me.
Hemingway doesn't just support medical marijuana "more than Hassan does," he wants to decriminalize all marijuana. Plus, Hemingway also wants to fight Federal surveillance, wiretapping, tracking, data collection, etc and protect private medical records and student privacy. So, it makes sense for civil libertarians to support Hemingway.
