Wiki Article of the Month Act (Now Law of the Land)

[Fmr. Pres. Duke]

Sure, as long as we have interest in it. Committees in the past have failed miserably, so I hope this one is different.

[Fmr. Pres. Duke]

Just say no to excessive committees. It's a simple slogan I have sitting on my desk.

[Fmr. Pres. Duke]

Just say no to excessive committees. It's a simple slogan I have sitting on my desk.

Does that mean you think the article of the month idea is a bad one? If not, how would you propose deciding what the article of the month is?

It's a great idea, but do we really need a committee to decide? They normally end up with one really active member and several inactive ones, so why not cut out the middle men and have it one or two people who care?

Note: one or two people does not constitute a committee - rather a few concerned citizens.

[Fmr. Pres. Duke]

Two people could result in a tie, though...

Are people really going to argue over a Wiki article? Maybe the AG could break the tie in the event of one.

[Fmr. Pres. Duke]

Can the executive appoint a committee of those interested in such a project? I think this is needless legislation, much like the corn syrup one. Of course, if we're looking to make legislation for the sake of making it, then let me know and I'll shut up.

[Fmr. Pres. Duke]

Aye