Oh right, because 2,700 is representative of tens of millions of people. You can keep bloviating about your party switch all you want, because I don't believe you are sincere. I'm going to see how long you stick with this.
The fact is, this kind of language is tolerated on the left, which the Sarah Jeong New York Times incident also showed. A newspaper with 3 million subscribers now has an Editorial Board member with the same language. That's more people than will vote in Min-02 for Lewis. You want him to be, essentially, disqualified for Congress for what he said, but the same language is accepted on your side. That's called hypocrisy.
You can’t seriously believe that every NYT subscriber agrees with the views of one editorial board member
And not every Jason Lewis voter will agree with all of his radio show comments either.
Who voted to make Sarah whoever a NYT columnist? Also, I'm pretty sure a politician should be held to a higher standard than a newspaper columnist.
