Why was there a third-party surge in 1992? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 06:54:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why was there a third-party surge in 1992? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was there a third-party surge in 1992?  (Read 862 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« on: January 22, 2018, 09:13:23 PM »

People had Republican fatigue and Bush Sr. was unpopular, but the 80s Conservative Consensus was still very much in place, and people weren't sure about Clinton due to his scandals. It was also much less polarized in the 90s. Additionally, unlike many third party candidates, Perot had money, name recognition, and made the debate stage. He was also seen as a real contender to win at points, so there was less concern about "wasting your vote."
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.