IBD/TIPP nat. poll: D: Clinton 45% Sanders 43%; R: Trump 31% Cruz 20% Rubio 18%

[IceSpear]

Laughably inconsistent with the state polls.

[IceSpear]

Dems:

Northeast: Sanders +8
Midwest: Sanders +7
South: Clinton +19
West: Sanders +10
urban: Clinton +3
suburban: Clinton +7
rural: Sanders +7

Not really jiving with the whole 'Clinton winning Iowa, Sanders up 1 in Wisc, losing Michigan, Illinois polls' scenario. Still, I would imagine that Sanders is gaining a bit from undecided each week. Probably not enough to win at this point

Even the South crosstab seems to drastically underestimate Clinton.

[IceSpear]

Laughably inconsistent with the state polls.

This is an election in the USA, not just the CSA

I wasn't aware PA, MI, IL, NJ, etc. were confederate states. Not to mention Bernie tied or trailing in his own turf like WI/RI.

On that note, it's kind of difficult to put yourself in a moral high ground about Confederates and whatnot when West f'ing Virginia is supporting your candidate in a landslide.

[IceSpear]

This is a map of all polls conducted in February. If there was more than one, I averaged them. Utah was ambiguous but I gave it to Sanders. 30% shade = 1-10 point lead. 50% shade = 11-20 point lead. 90% shade = 20+ point lead.

Yeah, not exactly consistent with a toss up race nationally. How's he pulling that off? Winning California by 90 points? Give me an effing break.

[IceSpear]

Told you guys this was utter TRASH.

[IceSpear]

Told you guys this was utter TRASH.

SC is like 1% of primary voters.

It has her up 19 points in the South. Now obviously not every Southern state is going to be a 50 point drubbing, but it quite obviously shows that she's winning there by a much bigger margin than that, at the very least.