FL-SEN: Is Rubio about to bungle it? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 10:19:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  FL-SEN: Is Rubio about to bungle it? (search mode)
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: FL-SEN: Is Rubio about to bungle it?  (Read 105688 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #25 on: June 19, 2016, 04:31:28 PM »

Murphy really isn't a shoe-in, Grayson could win.

And I could hit the lottery tomorrow. But it's not gonna happen.

The polls show most voters still undecided. I know it's fun to look at Clinton v. Sanders, but that's a totally different race.

Exactly. The only reason Grayson is "close" is because something like 50-60% of voters are undecided. But once the old reliable Democratic voters do their research and go out to this low turnout primary, there's no way in hell they will select a clown like Grayson.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #26 on: June 21, 2016, 07:15:13 PM »

Why would Florida want a Senator who will go absentee again in 3 years? lol
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #27 on: June 21, 2016, 07:32:25 PM »

Why would Florida want a Senator who will go absentee again in 3 years? lol

Beruff has challenged Rubio to pledge to serve a full term, let's see if Rubio makes the pledge before jumping to conclusions.

He also pledged he wouldn't run for re-election, and even used that as a (sorry) excuse for his absenteeism.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #28 on: July 02, 2016, 05:29:22 PM »

The thing is that Alan Grayson isn't Todd Akin has serious viral appeal.

Didn't he lose by the biggest margin of any incumbent Democrat in 2010? Even people in R+20 districts performed better than him.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #29 on: July 27, 2016, 01:59:22 AM »


Grayson winning was never a serious possibility.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #30 on: August 31, 2016, 11:39:28 PM »
« Edited: August 31, 2016, 11:47:01 PM by IceSpear »

Anyone who is in any way associated with Bernie Sanders is a socialist. If you at any point supported him, you're a socialist. Anyone he supported at any time is also a socialist. Anyone related to him is a socialist, and anyone related to anyone who he supported or anyone who supported him is also a socialist. Red scare FTW!

Judging from his commentary on any "Socialist"'s primary, I'd say Wulfric is literally terrified of socialism. Like, a legit phobia that causes irrational behavior and thought.

I just know that it's a terrible ideology for this country. I'm scared that this country isn't realizing that as much as it should because a self-declared socialist got 43% of the national primary vote for the largest party in the united states, and in doing so came within striking distance of winning more states than Hillary (not counting the territories), and wasn't locked out of a majority of pledged delegates until June.

Also, the rule of "socialism by association" is thus:

Anyone who is improperly associated with Bernie Sanders is a socialist. If you at any point supported him for president, you're a socialist. Anyone he supported at any time before they won their party's nomination, and those related to such people, is also a socialist. Anyone related to him or anyone who supported him for president is also a socialist. People that were not endorsed by Sanders until they reached their respective general election are not socialists. Therefore, Hillary Clinton is not a socialist.

Wulfric, a staunch anti-socialist has a question to ask you -- do you consider Collin Peterson (noted Bernie endorser, but generally considered to be one of the most right-wing remaining Democrats in the House) to be a socialist?

Yes. He endorsed Sanders for president. Only a socialist would endorse a socialist presidential candidate.

LMAO. 10/10 trolling.

If Bernie married a right wing Republican woman because they got along so well (politics aside) and truly loved each other, would she be a socialist too?

Also, anyone related to him is a socialist? Are you implying socialism is genetic? If so, why is only socialism genetic and not any other political ideology? People disagree with their parents on politics all the time.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #31 on: September 01, 2016, 11:03:17 PM »

Not sure if this is the right place but I made some maps.


Democratic Senate Map

Libertarian Senate Map

I think it may be time to forcibly purge the Dixiecrats. Yes, a final solution is in order.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 11 queries.