When everyone said Obama couldn’t beat Clinton? Yeah, that never happened. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 14, 2024, 01:44:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  When everyone said Obama couldn’t beat Clinton? Yeah, that never happened. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: When everyone said Obama couldn’t beat Clinton? Yeah, that never happened.  (Read 2280 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« on: December 01, 2014, 06:52:55 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Kind of an old article, but I didn't see it until now, and it deconstructs the "2008 redux" talking point very well.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/07/01/remember-when-nobody-gave-obama-a-chance-to-beat-clinton-never-happened/
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2014, 07:05:04 PM »

The difference between long shot and couldn't win is purely semantics.

The article actually addresses that as well. It shows that "Hillary is inevitable!" wasn't actually much of a thing at the time, and only emerged as a retrospective narrative.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2014, 07:50:21 PM »

Hillary is currently given 9/13 odds of getting the nomination. She had greater than 70% odds at points during 2008.  Pretty pathetic that all the Hillary supporters seem to have is "she's inevitable".

Did you read the article? If so, what points did you disagree with?

By the way, the fact that Hillary hasn't actually declared yet is probably holding back some people on those betting sites. Polls are way more valuable than they are regardless.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2014, 08:44:52 PM »

Of course Hillary Clinton will inevitably win.

Just ask President Dewey.

Of course Chuck Schumer and James Lankford will inevitably win. Just ask President Dewey.

Seriously though, if you just want to apply the extremely lame "nobody ever knows what will happen!!!11!1!!1!11!" thing to every election, why bother discussing politics at all?
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2014, 09:12:50 PM »

Of course Hillary Clinton will inevitably win.

Just ask President Dewey.

Of course Chuck Schumer and James Lankford will inevitably win. Just ask President Dewey.

Seriously though, if you just want to apply the extremely lame "nobody ever knows what will happen!!!11!1!!1!11!" thing to every election, why bother discussing politics at all?



For the definition of HISSY FIT, look in the dictionary under IceSpear.

That...wasn't a hissy fit? Huh It was a genuine question. Obviously nothing is a complete certainty, but it seems there's some cognitive dissonance at play here. If anyone suggested Senators like Schumer, Lankford, Leahy, etc. could lose because "anything can happen in politics! PRESIDENT DEWEY!!!!!!!!!!!" they'd be laughed off the forum.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2014, 12:37:25 AM »

Of course Hillary Clinton will inevitably win.

Just ask President Dewey.

Of course Chuck Schumer and James Lankford will inevitably win. Just ask President Dewey.

Seriously though, if you just want to apply the extremely lame "nobody ever knows what will happen!!!11!1!!1!11!" thing to every election, why bother discussing politics at all?

The difference is that polling 2 years ago in an open-seat general election is almost invariably wrong, whereas OK/NY senatorial predictions are not. 

Hillary is most likely the next President, but hardly a shoe-in.

Well, we were discussing the primary. Of course she's not a lock in the general.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 11 queries.