MW: The Midwestern Althing Reform Amendment (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 05:25:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  MW: The Midwestern Althing Reform Amendment (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MW: The Midwestern Althing Reform Amendment (Failed)  (Read 1742 times)
GAworth
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,755
United States


« on: October 15, 2014, 05:14:11 PM »

Thank you very much Archduke for bringing this amendment to the floor. This will be a referendum that the people of the Midwest will vote upon. I have supported the regionalization of the Althing's seats. This is a simple reform. I look forward to any questions and possible amendments.
Logged
GAworth
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,755
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2014, 10:56:32 PM »

I'm also in full support of this amendment, but for Section 3, Part II, I don't think we're able to intrude on a person's right to change districts under federal law, and at the end in Section 5 (or a Section 6) just add a disclaimer that it amends Section II, Part B of the 4th Midwest Constitution.

Everything else looks great though. Districts could make elections more fun and orderly, and I would personally support implementing them, but that will be up to the voters to decide.

I do have an additional idea to add to this that could increase the activity and representation in the Althing. For Section 1, I would recommend we increase the # of Althing seats to 4; adding another Althing seat which in-turn could help give the Archduke/Speaker a little more well-deserved power in breaking ties.

I've gone through the census and there's still a really good way to get 4 districts out of our region:

District 1 - Minnesota - 8
District 2 - Iowa - 7
District 3 - Montana - 3, Wyoming - 1, North Dakota - 1, South Dakota - 1, Manitoba - 1, Alberta (Canada) - 0, Saskatchewan (Canada) - 0, Northwestern Territories (Canada) - 0
District 4 - Colorado - 4, Nebraska - 2, Kansas - 0, Oklahoma - 1

We could always go with 3 to, but what do you guys think?

I am always in favor of upping the number of seats to 4. But I fear that we already struggle enough with getting enough people to run for the 3 seats. I am down for the addition of the constitution, when I am more awake tomorrow I will move an amendment if no one else wants does it first.
Logged
GAworth
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,755
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2014, 07:30:53 PM »


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This amends the bill for the section it amends. I will leave the discussion of a fourth seat for another amendment.
Logged
GAworth
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,755
United States


« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2014, 10:43:41 AM »

Pretty much, however, States can only be in one district, so it will not be absolute.
Logged
GAworth
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,755
United States


« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2014, 02:34:17 PM »

The bill can always be defeated if you strongly believe it is flawed. I introduced the bill because I believe in districts serving a purpose. To allow for all of the region to be included in the Althing. I also think changing the status quo of our electoral structure is not a bad idea.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.