Inks.LWC v. Governor of the Mideast (Benconstine) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 05:33:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Inks.LWC v. Governor of the Mideast (Benconstine) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Inks.LWC v. Governor of the Mideast (Benconstine)  (Read 4542 times)
Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74

WWW
« on: September 10, 2008, 11:20:27 PM »

As the Attorney General, I don't believe I have any legal authority here, but because I'm a nice guy, I'll look at this and offer some free advice.

The first voting booth simply said vote for 3 but did not specify the voting method. All voters voted as if the election were using approval voting. So this election resulted in 0 valid ballots and a 4 way tie among 4 candidates.

The Mideast Constitution only addresses vacancies and does not address the event of a tie.

1. This a flaw in the Constitution that must be fixed.

2. The governor could try holding a second election (which has happened) or appoint members (which as happened) but because this was the result of a tie and not a vacancy a member of the region would have a strong case that the governor does not have the power to do either one of these since it is not stated in the Constitution.

If you want to be safe, work on a Constitutional Amendment that would that would address what to do in the event of a tie, pass it, then implement that method.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.