Southeastern Initiatives for February (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 05:14:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Southeastern Initiatives for February (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Southeastern Initiatives for February  (Read 1921 times)
Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74

WWW
« on: January 23, 2006, 10:20:09 PM »
« edited: January 23, 2006, 10:24:48 PM by Atty. Gen. Brandon H »

Lottery has a little bit of history behind it. And Q would have to delete this SE Lottery website if this one was abolished.

I don't think we need alcohol and cannibus.

Although he dropped out, Naso's mass transit plan would make him the ideal candidate for transportation commissioner.

(Whoever created these (TCash?) did say they were joke positions, right?)

Edit: It was Q, not TCash.

Initiative 108: Abolition of Commissioners Initiative

The offices of Lottery Commissioner, Alcohol Commissioner, Tobacco Commissioner, Hemp and Cannabis Commissioner, and Transportation Commisioner are hereby abolished.

Boo!  We need bloated bureaucracy!  There are no salaries, and these are just joke positions for fun anwyay.
Logged
Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74

WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2006, 05:28:45 PM »

OK. I know you put Q as the Hemp and Cannabis Commissioner before be became SoFA. I thought that's when these positions were created.
Logged
Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74

WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2006, 12:40:33 AM »

If creation of the Treasurer would reduce some of the other commissioners than I would favor this initiative, but I think perhaps we could expand the role of the Lt. Governor so a Treasurer may not be necessary. And perhaps the budget should be the responsibility of the Gov., Lt. Gov., and Treasurer.
Logged
Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74

WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2006, 06:53:44 PM »

While I am not completely opposed to these changes, these are big changes and I am curious why they were not proposed until less than a week before the election?
Logged
Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74

WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2006, 06:52:11 PM »

While I am not completely opposed to these changes, these are big changes and I am curious why they were not proposed until less than a week before the election?
Because then we'd have to wait another month to get this through.

We need to make progress now, not one month from now!

Then why did you wiat until now to propose it when we've had three and a half weeks since the last initiative vote? Why didn't you propose this when you proposed the Treasurer Amendment?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.