No abortions period (as stated in the Constitution "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property with out due process of law").
In case of rape, while I sympathize with the situation, a child should be killed for the crimes of their father.
In the case of the life of the mother requires a little clarification. Abortion is the
intentional killing of the unborn child. If the woman's life is in danger, then the doctor should do everything possible to attempt to save both lives, but accepting the fact that there is a possibility the child could die.
Eventually though the pro-abortion movement will abort itself into extinction. Since someone getting an abortion is pro-abortion, had they not gotten that abortion there would have been a pro-abortion voter in 18 years. If a pro-life woman is pregant and has her child, most likely that child be a pro-life voter in 18 years. And now many post-abortive women as well as doctors who once performed abortions are realizing that abortion is wrong as well as the fact that there is no such thing as a "safe" abortion.
If people who claim to be "pro-choice" were really "pro-choice" then there would be a lot less abortions. Instead most "pro-choice" people don't want people considering abortions to have information that would lead them to make a choice other than choosing to abort their child.
Of course if abortion industry were honest, each state would still have the right to dictate its own laws instead of having to abide by the Judicial Activism of the Surpeme Court. What weren't they honest about?
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42462
