Dirty South September Initiatives Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 12:26:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Dirty South September Initiatives Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Dirty South September Initiatives Thread  (Read 5314 times)
Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74

WWW
« on: August 26, 2009, 02:46:37 PM »

I suggest we look at reactivation of the Southeast Deficit Package Initiative:
https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Southeast_Deficit_Package_Initiative


End to Fractional Reserve Banking Act
All banks operating in the Dirty South shall be required to have 100% reserves for all demand deposits

I would suggest changing this to something along the lines of banks shall have 1 year (maybe longer) to come into compliance. Maybe something else like they would have 6 months to be at least 50%. At a minimum specify a time line for them to come into compliance.
Logged
Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74

WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2009, 10:25:34 AM »

In the article, Rothbard mentions something like "Suppose I have my own bank" instead of the federal reserve. We had an initiative that was ruled unconstitutional that would have had the Southeast using its own currency. As long as the region has to operate using federal reserve notes, I'm not sure we could eliminate FRB without putting us at a disadvantage compared to other regions.

I do have a contact that's an economics professor at Loyola. I'm tempted to ask him what he thinks would happen if this were done.
Logged
Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74

WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2009, 02:29:15 PM »

In the article, Rothbard mentions something like "Suppose I have my own bank" instead of the federal reserve. We had an initiative that was ruled unconstitutional that would have had the Southeast using its own currency. As long as the region has to operate using federal reserve notes, I'm not sure we could eliminate FRB without putting us at a disadvantage compared to other regions.

I do have a contact that's an economics professor at Loyola. I'm tempted to ask him what he thinks would happen if this were done.

I suspect that economist would agree that fractional reserve banking is bad
http://www.lewrockwell.com/block/block110.html
http://www.lewrockwell.com/block/block111.html


I have no doubt FRC is bad or that Dr. Block would say it's bad. What would happen if only banks in one state could not use FRC while the others could. Not to mention if anything bad happens to the banks as a result of it, the federal government would just bail them out anyway. If we are going to end FRC, it would have to be done at the federal rather than regional level.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 11 queries.