official SC Democratic results thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 10:25:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  official SC Democratic results thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: official SC Democratic results thread  (Read 22525 times)
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« on: January 26, 2008, 04:54:15 PM »

Obama can't afford anything less than having this one called for him the moment the polls close.

The networks didn't call uncommitted vs. Clinton in Michigan.  They aren't calling this one upfront and, if they do, it's going to be the surprise of the primary reason.  Probably would even eclipse NH.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2008, 05:15:57 PM »

The problem from these reports is that they're relative to the GOP primary, which is unhelpful because some areas just have more Democrats...but if Dorchester County is reporting a higher turnout than last weekend overall, suffice it to say that Dem turnout is strong.  (Actually, it's unclear, since some report as "average" - average of what?)

Reports from various counties:
Marlboro County (Bennettsville) -- heavy
Majority black, but not by much.  A good share of Democratic whites.

Dorchester County (St. George) -- slightly heavier than last weekend
Heavily white and fairly well-off.  Strongly Republican

Charleston County (Charleston) -- much heavier in some precincts
Wow!!!  Heavily Democratic precincts, by chance?

Williamsburg County (Kingstree) -- average
Heavily black

Edgefield County (Edgefield) -- very busy
Mostly white, although most primary voters are doubtlessly black

Cherokee County (Gaffney) -- greater turnout than last week
Pretty impressively in a nearly 2-to-1 GOP county

Hampton County (Hampton) -- turnout is much higher than last week
Again, in a place where Kerry broke 60%, this is pretty useless information

Darlington County (Darlington) -- fairly good
Fairly good for what?  Whatever.

This information is pretty useless, overall.  No strong trends.  Not great news for either Obama or Clinton.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2008, 06:53:09 PM »

Fox said people who thought Bill Clinton's campaigning was important broke evenly between Obama and Clinton. This is going to be a landslide.

I don't think that's particularly indicative, but we'll see.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2008, 06:55:47 PM »

Why does CNN use that lame color coding?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2008, 06:59:18 PM »

CNN says they will project a winner upon close, it looks like.  If that's what "shortly" means.

Probable Obama landslide(Huh).
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #5 on: January 26, 2008, 07:00:06 PM »

Projected for Obama

Holy anticlimax Batman.

Second place contest between Clinton and Edwards.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #6 on: January 26, 2008, 07:02:58 PM »

Blacks 81-17 Obama.  Edwards at 1% (ouch!)

White voters Edwards 39%, Clinton 36%, Obama 24% (ouch)

Black women stronger for Obama than men?  Huh.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #7 on: January 26, 2008, 07:04:15 PM »

White men Edwards 44, Clinton 28%, Obama 27%

White women Clinton 42%, Edwards 35%, Obama 22%
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #8 on: January 26, 2008, 07:08:18 PM »

61% of voters were women (yikes), only 10% were under 30.


Not yet.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #9 on: January 26, 2008, 07:10:14 PM »

Is CNN's exit poll just not up yet online, or merely not working for me?

Not up yet
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #10 on: January 26, 2008, 07:15:27 PM »

FIRST RESULTS IN--

OBAMA LEADS 70%, CLINTON 18%, EDWARDS 12%!!!

Eraserhead, thoughts?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #11 on: January 26, 2008, 07:20:11 PM »

Damn, that's some strong black turnout.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #12 on: January 26, 2008, 07:22:55 PM »


Yes.  He hasn't had a vote yet Tongue
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #13 on: January 26, 2008, 07:24:57 PM »

Actually Obama will be in the mid 50s....that'll be enough to make him the new frontrunner.

Don't be too optimistic.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #14 on: January 26, 2008, 07:41:48 PM »
« Edited: January 26, 2008, 07:43:19 PM by Alcon »


"Sex By Black"?  Interesting... Tongue
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #15 on: January 26, 2008, 08:05:55 PM »


And was a joke before he dropped out.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #16 on: January 26, 2008, 08:53:01 PM »

It looks like Clinton will probably carry Horry County (Myrtle Beach) and nothing else.

One of 46 counties.

Ouch.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #17 on: January 26, 2008, 11:01:19 PM »

Insane turnout:

There were almost 80% as many votes in this primary as there were for Kerry in the 2004 General.

Excluding unallocated votes (which inflates numbers some), this went as high as 93% in the third district.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #18 on: January 26, 2008, 11:13:27 PM »
« Edited: January 26, 2008, 11:17:15 PM by Alcon »

In fact, turnout in Newberry County was 102% of what Kerry's vote in 2004 was.  Considering that growth was only about 2 percent, that's absolutely incredible.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #19 on: January 27, 2008, 01:47:12 AM »

One thing I admire about Hildebrand is that he just said no to handing out walking around money - a first on the Dem side in SC.

Walking-around money?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 13 queries.