Field poll: Schwarzenegger leads Angelides 49-33 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 10:47:40 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Field poll: Schwarzenegger leads Angelides 49-33 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Field poll: Schwarzenegger leads Angelides 49-33  (Read 4100 times)
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« on: November 04, 2006, 04:05:08 AM »

Lt. Governor:
Garamendi (D): 44% (41)
McClintock (R): 43% (39)

Sleeper race of the year?

It's been close for a while, so I'm not sure why it would be much of a "sleeper."

And certainly, I'd say Idaho's Gubernatorial race qualifies for that title above this any day.  But I suppose this is one of the only pleasant surprises the GOP has, so I guess this is their best "sleeper race."  Not that that's saying much.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2006, 05:26:53 AM »

It's been close for a while, so I'm not sure why it would be much of a "sleeper."

McClintock is famous, nationally, and this is the first mention he even has a race since the primary.

And yes, I realize he is not as famous as Young Jeezy or whoever.

No...it's not.  You see the numbers next to those percentages?  They're the last poll numbers.  Garamendi has gone from +2 to...+1.

It's probably a sad reflection on my knowledge of pop culture that I know more about Tom McClintock than Young Jeezy or whomever.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2006, 01:25:29 PM »

You were totally right John...even about the not having 50-40 disapproval (although I doubt you meant it this way Tongue)
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2006, 03:33:14 PM »

You were totally right John...even about the not having 50-40 disapproval (although I doubt you meant it this way Tongue)

I was absolutley right.  Read it again.  I said he would not have a 40-50 approve-disapprove rating (Which is about what he had a year ago).  He would not have a 40% approve 50% disapprove rating.  And he does not.

I know...that's what I said...

Although, checking the numbers, he actually has an approval pretty close to 50-40 down in the polls I can find.  I was thinking that he was further down...when I first read those comments, I thought that you were saying he'd have better than 40-50, and I was saying "even though I doubt you meant it that way" because of that.

Am I making any sense to you?  Because I'm barely to myself.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.