Can you cite your claim that Moore and Riley are historically so good?
Get some political experience in Oregon, anybody will tell you Moore is THE man, and Riley is still respected. Research some blogs on Oregon politics, or call up some political science departments at the major Universities in the state. I'm not going to go digging for links on a simple fact of Oregon politics.
Take it or leave it. I could really care less.
If this fact is so universal, why can I find no mentions on the Internet of this?
Riley screwed up 2000 and 2004 big time; he was good in 2002. That's not a record worth trusting. What magical source manages to spin Riley's 2000 and 2004 screw-ups as being a good pollster?
Riley is also Saxton's pollster. Major issues there.
I'm glad to know that you could care less. Until you can't care less, please back up what you say with facts or don't bother saying them. I'm not adverse to the idea of being wrong; I'm adverse to the idea of you telling me to call a political scientist in Oregon, obviously not someone who I'd have on speed dial.