Most Vulnerable Governorships (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 04:17:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Most Vulnerable Governorships (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Most Vulnerable Governorships  (Read 3450 times)
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« on: June 01, 2006, 08:27:33 PM »

13. NEVADA (Open-R)
14. CALIFORNIA (Schwarzenegger-R)

Uh?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2006, 03:58:42 PM »

Why should I rank Oregon higher than any of the other races? I definitely think Oregon is in play, but so are a lot of Governor's mansions.

The latest poll shows Kulongoski up by only two points without Ben Westlund included.  Even if Westlund polls in at the very lowest range people are predicting (which is around 8 percent), that would probably be enough to give the GOP the advantage.

I would even wager that the GOP is probably ahead right now.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2006, 04:14:11 PM »

Why should I rank Oregon higher than any of the other races? I definitely think Oregon is in play, but so are a lot of Governor's mansions.

The latest poll shows Kulongoski up by only two points without Ben Westlund included.  Even if Westlund polls in at the very lowest range people are predicting (which is around 8 percent), that would probably be enough to give the GOP the advantage.

I would even wager that the GOP is probably ahead right now.

I don't take one single poll like that and read too much into it. And why would Westlund do that well? I have to say that I give a Democratic incumbent in a Democratic state in a Democratic year the edge, even if he is impopular. I do think it'll be close, but Wisconsin is right now looking closer to me.

I would not either.  However, Oregon is not an extremely Democratic state.  Kulongoski is dangerously unpopular.

The only reason Kerry won in 2004 was the independent vote, of course.  In places like Washington County, where Republicans still outnumber Democrats significantly, the self-identified independent vote is critical.  Every approval poll has shown Kulongoski's disapproval among independents over 60 percent.  Washington County and suburban independents will eat up a candidate like Ben Westlund - moderate libertarian with a liberal lean.  Every prediction I have seen says he should achieve between 8% and 25%.  I'm not sure what to think of that, but it sounds fairly reasonable.

Now, here's the big, big rub.  The Rasmussen poll showing Kulongoski up two had a 52-44 approval surplus.  Surplus!  This is the only poll to show a positive approval rating for Kulongoski.

Westlund not being included, and the ridiculously positive approval rating for Kulongoski, both make me think that the GOP probably has a pretty decent advantage working here.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.