Alcon
Atlas Superstar
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 30,866
![](./avatars/Independent/I_WA.gif)
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« on: March 04, 2016, 03:32:08 AM » |
|
|
« edited: March 04, 2016, 03:49:47 AM by Grad Students are the Worst »
|
I hate to only respond to one part of this thread, but the sudden drop-off in mass-shootings in Australia is almost entirely a function of the Port Arthur shooting happening, no? I know firearm homicides decreased, but overall homicides did not, and I believe most Western countries -- the U.S. included -- saw a decrease in firearm homicides over this period. I'm just not sure I find that evidence particularly persuasive or well-controlled.
also, "semi-automatic assault rifle" doesn't really mean anything. An "assault rifle" is a rifle with select fire capability, i.e., it can fire automatic OR semi-automatic. Civilian ownership of true "assault rifles" is rare, as far as I know. Most own semi-automatics, and saying "semi-automatic assault rifle" is mainly meaningless shorthand for "semi-automatic rifle that looks scary."
I'm not sure I can think of a single mass-shooting involving an automatic weapon, anyway. Automatic weapons are heavily controlled and aren't even dramatically more dangerous in mass-shooting scenarios.
|