That is a question for the electorate in the district to decide.
Are we not allowed to have opinions on whether or not it's completely and totally stupid?
My point is simply that the electorate does have a right to judge whether, or not, playing WoW is in fact "completely and totally stupid." If his attacks resonates he has furthered his cause. If it doesn't, he hasn't. The voters can decide.
I think that everyone is aware that voters have the right to decide based on whatever ridiculous grounds they choose to, and I'm not sure why you feel the need to point that out in a thread where no one is denying that -- just judging their rationality for doing so in certain ways.
