Romney: 'I'm not concerned about the very poor' (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 08:51:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Romney: 'I'm not concerned about the very poor' (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Romney: 'I'm not concerned about the very poor'  (Read 24141 times)
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« on: February 01, 2012, 02:18:35 PM »

Romney is guilty of leaving out the word "just" in front of "concerned"Sad

No, that's not what he said.  He said that he thinks the current safety nets for the very poor are sufficient, although he will reform them if needed.  He goes on to juxtapose this, and his similar lesser concern about the rich, with his policy focus on the middle class.  I don't think what he meant is intrinsically offensive, although it's certainly debatable, but he clearly implied that he's less concerned policy-wise about the folks at the extremes.  Saying "I'm not just concerned about the very poor" doesn't communicate his main point.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2012, 02:24:22 PM »
« Edited: February 01, 2012, 02:26:13 PM by Alcon »

Romney is guilty of leaving out the word "just" in front of "concerned"Sad

No, that's not what he said.  He said that he thinks the current safety nets for the very poor are sufficient, although he will reform them if needed.  He goes on to juxtapose this, and his similar lesser concern about the rich, with his policy focus on the middle class.  I don't think what he meant is intrinsically offensive, although it's certainly debatable, but he clearly implied that he's less concerned policy-wise about the folks at the extremes.  Saying "I'm not just concerned about the very poor" doesn't communicate his main point.

He said he cares about all Americans. He was trying to get across that he's not just concerned with very poor or very rich Americans. He is largely concerned with middle-class Americans who are feeling the pinch more than anybody right now. The poor are just as poor as they were ten years ago, but middle-class Americans are much worse off and not feeling good about the future.

He said he cares about all Americans, but he said doesn't see much policy concern with the very poor.  That is probably honest, and it may also be reasonable.  However, it is an immensely stupid thing to say, and an immensely stupid way to think really, as a Presidential candidate.  This gaffe was offered on a silver platter -- he wasn't under any pressure here -- and it's all over even the barely-news news sites (like the MSN login screen.)  I agree with Torie.  He needs to do better than this.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2012, 02:28:42 PM »

Again, he left out "just" in front of "concerned." That is the gaffe.

No.  (It's annoying when I took the time to rebut that and you pretend like you didn't even see my post.)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.