Attitudes towards a woman President (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 12:43:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Attitudes towards a woman President (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which best describes your attitude towards a woman President?
#1
It would be beneficial for society to have a woman President provided she agreed with my views
 
#2
I'd vote for my party/ideology's candidate and it doesn't matter what gender they are
 
#3
I'd vote for a woman President who shared my views, but am uncomfortable with the idea of a woman President
 
#4
I would never vote for a woman President
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 79

Author Topic: Attitudes towards a woman President  (Read 10802 times)
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« on: January 01, 2005, 03:40:14 AM »

Option 2, with a little bit of 1. I'd like to see it stop being such a men's club, but there's no way that this would change my vote unless I was a total swing voter.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2005, 08:13:58 PM »

If she had proven herself a capable leader with integrity, why would people be so nervous about a woman president? I just don't understand it.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2005, 11:18:14 PM »

Doubtful I would vote for a woman to be commander in chief of the armed forces, but I would if she was the most qualified candidate (likely by virtue of all the other ones sucking).
You're Not an Idiot!Not in this case anyway. I agree with you here.  A woman should never be President of the United States of America. Tradition does count for something. They also shouldn't be preachers/ministers.

Uh, "tradition"? All presidents have also had blue eyes. Does that mean we should never elected a brown-eyed president?

Tradition counts for something, but tradition is not an excuse to never change. Tradition is simply a blockade when it interferes with progress.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2005, 11:25:28 PM »

Doubtful I would vote for a woman to be commander in chief of the armed forces, but I would if she was the most qualified candidate (likely by virtue of all the other ones sucking).
You're Not an Idiot!Not in this case anyway. I agree with you here.  A woman should never be President of the United States of America. Tradition does count for something. They also shouldn't be preachers/ministers.

Uh, "tradition"? All presidents have also had blue eyes. Does that mean we should never elected a brown-eyed president?

Tradition counts for something, but tradition is not an excuse to never change. Tradition is simply a blockade when it interferes with progress.
Progress is not having a woman President.

Actually, by definition, progress means "going forwards." That would be changing nothing, so it wouldn't be progress.

Why is not electing women a tradition? It just has not happen. By that argument, slavery was a tradition, as was the feeding of Christians to lions.

Behind quoting the Bible to tell someone they are wrong, saying "we shouldn't do that because we have not done it before" is my least favorite argument for anything.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.