If the electoral college trend were to hold for next 100 years

[Alcon]

For those interested, here is the list of the largest states (very entertaining):

1.) California (65)
2.) Texas (54)
3.) Florida (47)
4.) Georgia (35)
5.) Arizona (30)
6.) North Carolina (25)
7.) Colorado (19)
8.) Nevada (15)
" " New Jersey
10.) Virginia (13)
11.) Massachusetts (12)
12.) Illinois (11)
" "   Missouri
" "   New York
" "   Tennessee
" "   Washington
17.) Maryland (10)
" "   Minnesota
" "   Ohio
20.) Alabama (9)
" "   Louisiana
22.) Kentucky (
" "   South Carolina
24.) Iowa (7)
" "   Michigan
" "   Oregon
27.) Arkansas (6)
" "   Kansas
29.) Nebraska (5)
" "   New Mexico
" "   Utah
" "   West Virginia
33.) Hawaii (4)
" "   Idaho
" "   Maine
" "   New Hampshire
" "   Rhode Island
38.) Alaska (3)
" "   Connecticut
" "   Delaware
" "   District of Columbia
" "   Indiana
" "   Mississippi
" "   Montana
" "   North Dakota
" "   Oklahoma
" "   Pennsylvania
" "   South Dakota
" "   Vermont
" "   Wisconsin
" "   Wyoming

What I'd also like to see: these trends continued for more than 10 years...now THAT would be a map.

California, Texas, Florida, Georgia, Colorado, North Carolina, and Georgia: 537
All those other useless states: 1

[Alcon]

What sort of model are you using, anyways?
Linear is bad
Exponential is bad
Logistical is less bad, but still bad

Linear. That's the point - it is just for fun.

[Alcon]

Fun with logarithms!





Red: change
Blue: no change

What is the 3 (2) thing for South Dakota?

By the way, gotta love the changes in...well..Wisconsin, Oklahoma, Montana, Mississippi, and Connecticut.