The "Who is running?" tea leaves thread (Part 2) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 09:12:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  The "Who is running?" tea leaves thread (Part 2) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The "Who is running?" tea leaves thread (Part 2)  (Read 196499 times)
daveosupremo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 468
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.32, S: -2.09

« on: March 18, 2015, 05:46:33 PM »


He has a new fetish of rubbing ladies' shoulders with their husbands present, so he'd be wise to sit this one out...  The media and the GOP would eat him alive.

Oh calm down Polly Prissy-Pants

Yeah, haven't you heard? Much like his blatantly racist remarks and consistent buffoonery, Uncle Joe gets a pass on what any workplace environment in America would consider sexual harassment, because, hey, it's only harmless old Joe.
Logged
daveosupremo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 468
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.32, S: -2.09

« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2015, 11:53:08 AM »


No sh[inks] he's not running. The media's desperation in trying to make "anti-Clintons" appear out of thin air has reached the point of absurdity.

What about Mark Pryor or Joe Lieberman? Surely they could harvest the vast dissatisfaction among  Democrats about Hillary (which every poll shows does not actually exist.)

Wait, even better idea: COULD BILL CLINTON BE THE ANTI HILLARY??!?!?!!?!?!? Mind = blown.

It's time for the media to grow up, end their denial, and start reporting actual reality rather than their wish lists. Just like children have to suck it up and eat their broccoli, it is past time for the media to suck it up and accept Hillary is the nominee.
We should probably just shut down the 2016 board, considering the foregone conclusion of President Hillary.
Logged
daveosupremo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 468
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.32, S: -2.09

« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2015, 12:16:07 AM »

Who gives a sh**t about Carson? Really.
FOX. Half these clowns are only in the race for that job.

Good point. Carson is probably running for president to land a gig at Fox, much like the one he had to give up to in order run for president.

But seriously, I have no idea why he would run. The only two reasons I can think of are that he legitimately feels called by God to do it, or he's just bored and needs something to do, and he likes the adoration of his fans.
Logged
daveosupremo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 468
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.32, S: -2.09

« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2015, 08:37:43 PM »

they would run for the same reason that someone like Lindsay Graham is running, to raise their profile and hopes to get into the cabinet.
Lindsey Graham doesn't want to be in the cabinet.
Logged
daveosupremo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 468
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.32, S: -2.09

« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2015, 09:23:26 PM »

Santorum to announce May 27

http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/06/politics/rick-santorum-election-2016-announcement/index.html
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.