Tim Scott: “You strike, you’re fired! Simple concept to me” (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 12:44:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Tim Scott: “You strike, you’re fired! Simple concept to me” (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Tim Scott: “You strike, you’re fired! Simple concept to me”  (Read 4886 times)
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,685
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
« on: September 19, 2023, 08:00:13 PM »

Notice that today none of the major candidates said anything of note for Lyndon to twist into a ten minute hate, so he had to latch on to this relatively generic pro-union busting comment from a relatively generic Republican candidate.

Ignoring nearly a hundred year old federal law on the subject isn't exactly just standard Union busting.

But go on. I absolutely love to see conservative tears shed over LL being such unfair meanie to Republicans when in fact he's usually right.
But he also has an extreme burning hatred for every single person who voted for Bernie Sanders, not just "Bernie Bros." He hates every single person who ever supported Bernie and you think I should just overlook that.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,685
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2023, 09:39:55 PM »

This guy is one of the worst politicians I’ve ever seen. Everything that comes out of his mouth is the most unpopular way to frame the most right-wing policies.

The real funny thing is he only has his Senate seat because of affirmative action, probably one of the most blatant examples ever, the previous incumbent resigned in early 2013 to take some lobbyist gig and he got appointed to it despite having only served in the House for a single term and had only been in the South Carolina House for a single term prior to that. So why did he get appointed over the many ambitious Republicans in South Carolina and all the other House members who were no doubt interested with much more tenure? I think it's pretty obvious.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 7 queries.