Would you be okay with U.S. being a parliamentary system? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 07:45:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Would you be okay with U.S. being a parliamentary system? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Would you be okay with U.S. being a parliamentary system?  (Read 571 times)
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,435
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
« on: January 26, 2022, 02:04:45 PM »

I would favor a parliamentary system with 4-5 parties and proportional representation. I think that would help to end gridlock and stalemate and be better to represent a diverse country of over 330 million people.
Most countries with PR typically end up with a de facto two-party system, just with the two parties being coalitions instead of parties in the American sense, and those that don't often end up with a sort of state of permanent dysfunction or weirdos holding the balance of power. The US would definitely not be any different, you'd just see the Democratic and Republican parties fracture. There would be other benefits, such as the enfranchisement of people who live in strong areas for the other party, and being able to choose what faction of the party you want to support outside of a primary, and probably would on a whole be better, but it's silly to pretend that it would result in a true multi-party system, or that multi-party systems are particularly democratically healthy for that matter anyway. Look at Greece, Israel or various Eastern European countries for examples of how multi-party systems don't mean more of a healthy democratic system.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,435
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2022, 04:32:32 PM »

I would prefer it. As long as we got rid of FPTP, having more parties would better represent such a large and diverse country. Two parties is no longer enough, especially with how partisan they have become.
Like a lot of posts in this thread, two different things are being conflated. A Parliamentary system does not mean a multi-party system or lack of FPTP, as both Canada and the UK use FPTP as do some Commonwealth countries that have completely two party systems too (like in the Caribbean) and PR doesn't necessarily mean a Parliamentary system, for example Mexico has a system based on the US but uses PR to some level for Congress elections.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.