To the "Democrats" supporting Kean

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Did you ever consider that we now have a realistic, although slim chance at retaking the Senate? And we pretty much need to hold every seat to do it. Are you going to be happy if we pick up 6 seats but lose NJ and thus don't retake the Senate then?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Perhaps they care more about the issues, and the integrity of the senate rather than the balance of partisans?

Perhaps they care more about the issues, and the integrity of the senate rather than the balance of partisans?

Shhh . . . don't say such things. 

Anyway, to address Red's question, partisanship is no basis for electing someone to officer.  One must vote for the candidate that is qualified and will represent the states' interest in Congress, not a political party's interest.  As it is seen right now, Joe-mentum represents the states interest, not Lamont.  Kean represents the states interest, not Menendez.  The concept of voting for someone who does not support your views or will not act in the states best interest just so some political party can gain power is as anal retentive as it can get.

No, because that affects who majority leader is, and thus the agenda and who chairs all the committees. The partisan makeup affects the Senate drastically. This argument is crap. (Note neither of you are Democrats)

There's also the fact that Kean is as stupid as dogsh!t, but that's not really the point.