Weakest Presidential Candidate (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 04:40:32 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Weakest Presidential Candidate (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Weakest Presidential Candidate  (Read 8079 times)
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

« on: February 24, 2008, 10:45:22 PM »

Dukakis

The Mondale message would've resonated in 1992.

uh no.

there was a mondale in the 92 race.  his name was tom harkin.

He was probably referring to the general, where Harkin likely would've beaten Bush (albeit by a narrower margin than Clinton did).

Weakest of all time was probably either John Davis in 1924 or Alton Parker in 1904. Those guys were pretty bad....

In the modern TV era I'd say Dukakis was the worst candidate. Gore in 2000 was easily the worst campaign though.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

« Reply #1 on: March 25, 2008, 02:31:16 AM »

Mondale. He had the charisma of an oyster.

True, but at least he didn't scare people like McGovern or Goldwater.

On second thought those two were probably the worst. Both lost many areas that their parties had never lost before, at least not in 100 years or more.

I'd still pick Dukakis as honorable mention as the worst candidate who could've or should've won. McGovern and Goldwater would've never been nominated in the first place if their parties had any chance at all of actually winning those elections in the first place. A good Democratic candidate could've beaten Bush in 1988 or at least come close. Dukakis tried to pretend not to be liberal when he had really no moderate positions at all (at least by the standards of the day). That combined with his total lack of charisma and emotion enabled him to epically fail at connecting with most voters.

Gore's campaign is in my opinion the worst. Yes, he had a great grassroots turnout operation, but he managed to lose when the incumbent President had a 60 percent approval rating. All he had to do was run as Clinton's 3rd term, but instead chose to "be his own man" and distance himself. Commendable in some ways as I'm sure he wanted to feel he had earned the Presidency on his own rather than it being handed to him but still....ya gotta win above all else.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2008, 12:58:44 AM »

You all are wrong.

The right answer is Bob Dull, 1996. I was of political age then, and I can't remember a damn thing that man ran on (I do remember his Senate resignation, though).

Dole was quite boring, but considering how popular Clinton was he didn't do that badly. He was at least an acceptable alternative for those who hated Clinton, and most everyone agreed he'd have been a competent President. He never really gave a good rationale for why he wanted to be President other than that he wasn't Bill Clinton; he was kind of the Republican version of John Kerry in that regard, but running against a more popular incumbent than Kerry faced.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.