Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 01:04:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET) (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET)  (Read 69409 times)
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« on: June 07, 2016, 04:48:39 PM »
CA: 52-47 Clinton
MT: 58-41 Sanders
NJ: 60-40 Clinton
NM: 55-45 Clinton
ND: 65-35 Sanders
SD: 54-46 Sanders
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2016, 05:00:16 PM »
I think the big surprise for most will be the central valley mostly going to Sanders. Parts of the region are incredibly poor and rural, there's reasons to believe the Hispanics here won't be as friendly to Clinton as Hispanics in SoCal or the Bay area.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2016, 05:04:59 PM »
MSNBC changed their graphics recently. Honestly I'm not the biggest fan.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2016, 05:46:42 PM »
Quote from: Vega on June 07, 2016, 05:23:21 PM
Quote from: ElectionsGuy on June 07, 2016, 05:04:59 PM
MSNBC changed their graphics recently. Honestly I'm not the biggest fan.

Do you mean with the bar on the top of the screen that's now on the bottom like normal?

Instead of a blue or red background corresponding with the party they now have a white background with red or blue text and a check mark with yellow highlight. It looks so much more effortless.

We'll see if they stick with it tonight.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2016, 07:07:07 PM »
Quote from: Thinking Crumpets Crumpet on June 07, 2016, 07:04:17 PM
NYT graphics make it look like SD polls have closed. Is this the case?

In most of the state, yes.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #5 on: June 07, 2016, 08:12:12 PM »
Still leading by a lot in South Dakota with 17% in.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #6 on: June 07, 2016, 08:16:29 PM »
It looks like there's only going to be about 42000 votes in SD for Democrats.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #7 on: June 07, 2016, 08:18:35 PM »
Damn, Hillary barely leading in Bernalilo, NM.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #8 on: June 07, 2016, 08:26:25 PM »
This margin isn't changing. Its almost identical to 2008 actually.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #9 on: June 07, 2016, 08:27:48 PM »
Pennington just came in for Clinton.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #10 on: June 07, 2016, 08:29:58 PM »
Uncommitted at 8.5% in North Dakota. Odd.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #11 on: June 07, 2016, 08:52:52 PM »
Quote from: BundouYMB on June 07, 2016, 08:48:49 PM
Quote from: Maxwell on June 07, 2016, 08:47:26 PM
Rofl lmao the difference between North and South dakota results wtf

Ah the difference between when real elections are held vs. caucuses that can only be attended by rich white people.

Wouldn't that benefit Clinton if that was the case?
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #12 on: June 07, 2016, 08:55:32 PM »
Clinton up to 64-36 in New Jersey now, including a batch that just made Essex County 74% Clinton.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #13 on: June 07, 2016, 09:06:28 PM »
Sanders needs 56% of the remaining vote in South Dakota.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #14 on: June 07, 2016, 09:13:05 PM »
Does anyone think its strange that Pennington has less than 2,000 votes in the primary? Its a Republican county, but neighboring Lawrence County has more than half of its vote already and its 1/4 of the population of Pennington.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #15 on: June 07, 2016, 09:29:27 PM »
I knew something was wrong with Pennington. Glad that got fixed.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #16 on: June 07, 2016, 09:31:20 PM »
Most of the rest is Minnehaha and Lincoln, both urban/suburban counties by SD standards. Odds are Clinton ekes it out.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #17 on: June 07, 2016, 09:35:42 PM »
North Dakota

Sanders: 254 (64.5%)
Clinton: 101 (25.6%)
Uncommitted: 39 (9.9%)
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #18 on: June 07, 2016, 09:41:17 PM »
Quote from: Doctor Imperialism on June 07, 2016, 09:37:45 PM
Quote from: Doctor Imperialism on June 07, 2016, 09:24:03 PM
So I heard that Clinton's leading early votes by 9% in California - but how many early voters were there?

Anyone?

About 60% is early vote.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #19 on: June 07, 2016, 09:41:52 PM »
We should stop freaking out about Montana. Its almost all early/absentee.

Sanders needs 55% of remaining vote in both South Dakota and New Mexico.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #20 on: June 07, 2016, 10:07:24 PM »
Sanders needs 60% of the remaining vote in South Dakota. Its becoming a long shot at this point.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #21 on: June 07, 2016, 10:10:40 PM »
Every Clinton county except Lincoln in South Dakota is 100% reporting. Everything else is in the west.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #22 on: June 07, 2016, 10:35:11 PM »
The first California results were always going to favor Clinton, however it looks like too much for Sanders to outpace.

Calling South Dakota for Clinton now.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #23 on: June 07, 2016, 10:51:35 PM »
Clinton apparent winner in SD - MSNBC
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #24 on: June 07, 2016, 11:07:19 PM »
The social studies... lol
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 13 queries.