Neil Gorsuch Confirmation Process Discussion (confirmed 54-45) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 01:53:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Neil Gorsuch Confirmation Process Discussion (confirmed 54-45) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Neil Gorsuch Confirmation Process Discussion (confirmed 54-45)  (Read 57412 times)
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,011
« on: March 28, 2017, 07:30:32 AM »

Question: if Garland doesn't have 60 votes, and the Mitch decides to use nuclear option, will he need 50+Pence or 51 votes? When Reid did it, he had 52 votes so this wasn't in question.

50+ Pence. They'd potentially also get Pence to preside over the Senate during the nuclear option vote. At least that's how Republicans planned it when they first invented the concept.

They need 51 or 50 + Pence to change the Senate rules to invoke the nuclear option, but cloture would still require 51 senators. There's no tie to break. Cloture requires a certain fraction of the full number of senators voting to cut off debate.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,011
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2017, 08:06:56 AM »

Jeff Merkey might be starting a talking filibuster right now against Gorsuch.

Funny, isn't that the "Filibuster must be abolished" guy?

Again, unbelieveable Democratic hypocrisy...

He's only ever advocated for abolishing the procedural filibuster. He supports the talking filibuster and made a point of that in all of the interviews he gave on filibuster reform. So no, it's not hypocrisy.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,011
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2017, 12:55:28 PM »

Correct. Other than base pressure, I am still wondering just what animated the Dem strategy here.

I think it was to get Republicans to kill the filibuster for SCOTUS.

In 2013, they left cloture for SCOTUS alone because they were afraid that Republicans could stack the court with conservatives at some point. But when it became clear that they're going to block everybody anyway going forward as best they can, the filibuster would hinder Democrats' ability to appoint a liberal judge. So they would have to nuke themselves anyway at some point. Better to have the Republicans do it so as to avoid the political cost.

McConell was already telegraphing that Gorsuch would get through one way or another, so the filibuster had lost its effectiveness anyway. It might have been more effective politically if they waited until a liberal judge needed replacement to press the issue, but then again, we don't know if that will happen under Trump.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 10 queries.