What makes Ohio so [damn] stable (inelastic) in its voting patterns? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 05:28:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  What makes Ohio so [damn] stable (inelastic) in its voting patterns? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What makes Ohio so [damn] stable (inelastic) in its voting patterns?  (Read 2598 times)
Space7
Rookie
**
Posts: 154
Canada


« on: August 02, 2013, 12:51:01 PM »

Hmm...Ohio has voted for the winner of every presidential election starting with 1964.  That would mean that since 1980, it's voted for Reagan twice, George H. W. Bush once, Clinton twice, George W. Bush twice, and Obama twice.  I wouldn't quite call that inelastic, if you ask me.

Then again, I don't exactly know what you mean by "inelastic."
Nate silver coined the political use of the word "elastic" in this article:

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/21/swing-voters-and-elastic-states/?_r=0

Summed up, "inelasticity" means that the state isn't very sensitive to change in the political environment. This is referring to each election's individual PVI index, not the results of the election.

I think "stable" might have been a better word to use than "inelastic", because they have slightly different meanings.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 10 queries.