. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 02:40:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  . (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: .  (Read 15003 times)
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


« on: February 07, 2015, 03:54:05 PM »

For the most part, Economists don't actually think in terms of homo-economicus, though they might employ that logic from time to time.  The Health Care- Car market example is somewhat of a head scratcher for the reason that even some one with a modicum of economic knowledge can tear that one down. 

Logged
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2015, 09:44:28 PM »


Finding environments in which utility maximization cannot describe behavior is pretty damn difficult (I tell you this as someone who is working on precisely that for living). Not because "utility maximization" is such a great theory, but because it is not really much of a theory: it is more of a language, in which you can express pretty much anything.

Might just be the most well put description of the concept
Logged
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2015, 01:53:16 PM »

Sometimes I forget that people don't usually think on the margin in conversation
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.