Redistribution of Federal Electoral Districts 2012 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 06:20:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Redistribution of Federal Electoral Districts 2012 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Redistribution of Federal Electoral Districts 2012  (Read 179071 times)
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


« on: April 30, 2014, 12:47:46 PM »


A maximum deviation of 1.2% from the provincial average is quite unnecessary, and hinders your usual creativity.


US redistricting often involves obscenely small deviations, unfortunately.

425 out of the current 435 U.S. Congressional Districts (based on the 2010 Census) have deviations within 0.1% of their state quotient.  The remaining ten districts are in Maryland and West Virginia, the only two states that permit deviations between 0.1% and 1.0%.

http://cookpolitical.com/story/5478

Wow; looks like you should've made them even closer.

The US really is a country where the geographic-representation-forest cannot be seen for the geographic-representation-trees. 
Logged
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2014, 01:20:31 PM »

"British Columbia Southern Interior" is a beautiful, beautiful name.

I hope that's sarcasm.

I'd really like to see a lot of the superfluous directionals removed from riding names. There isn't a North Okanagan-Eask Kootenay, so why don't we just call it Okanagan-Kooteney? There is no Burnaby South-Seymour or East Okanagan-Coquihalla. If I were the redistribution king, I would mandate that directionals were minimized to where a proper toponomy simply can't be found. I'd also like to see m-dashes in riding names limited to one
Logged
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2014, 01:38:55 PM »

Only one of those has more than one emdash?
Logged
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2014, 02:36:28 PM »

ya, no more 'West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea-to-Sky Country.  I'd like to see it renamed Howe Sound or Garibaldi or something. 
Logged
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2014, 03:55:07 PM »



Ideally there should be a set of rules for naming ridings, and that in the very least the name should apply to at least 90% of inhabitants.


While that would produce names that our tasteless parliamentarians could accept, it wouldn't actually make them more manageable.  I personally think that the Alberta Commission did the best job with names this time
Logged
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2014, 01:52:13 PM »

Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes nearly beats West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea-to-Sky Country for syllable count. What an awful name.  Brantford-Brant gets honorable mention for derpishness

on the other hand, I would say that Orléans, Carlton, Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek, and North Island-Powell River are decided improvements, and Esquimalt-Saanich-Sooke is a modest one
Logged
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2014, 04:23:56 PM »

Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes nearly beats West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea-to-Sky Country for syllable count. What an awful name.  

Especially awful since there's absolutely no need for the name change. It's the same boundaries as before, and the boundaries are the exact same as the geographic Leeds & Grenville United Counties. Maybe it's a tourism issue.

In some of the other ridings, there's been a trend to lump in the names of independent cities (not under county administration). But calling the riding Leeds-Grenville-Brockville-Gananoque-Prescott would be only slightly more terrible.

So, arguably more horrible than West Van etc, being that West Vancouver, the Sunshine Coast, and the Sea-to-Sky Country are geographically and administratively separate regions with no common name.  I woulda just called the whole thing Howe Sound, but that's just me
Logged
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2014, 08:13:31 PM »

Can we have "Wolfe" back? Smiley
Logged
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


« Reply #8 on: June 11, 2014, 12:28:46 AM »

I have no desire to see Wolfe back as an administrative unit. I'm just amused that such a thing used to exist
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 11 queries.