U.S. State Government Adopting Parliamentary System (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 04:22:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  U.S. State Government Adopting Parliamentary System (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: U.S. State Government Adopting Parliamentary System  (Read 2198 times)
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


« on: August 25, 2011, 09:10:41 AM »
« edited: August 28, 2011, 10:25:12 AM by J. J. »

I think it would be.  The requirement is a "republican form of government," and you could have one with a weak executive.  Considering the variation in power of governors, currently, it would not be a stretch.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 28, 2011, 10:27:49 AM »

Sure.   Why not?  You wrote that it would be "(republican)".

What if say California were to adopt a (republican) parliamentary system?  Like say, where the governor is elected, but he/she is powerless and just appoints a cabinet from the majority party or coalition in the legislature, and dissolves the legislature on the advice of the state's prime minister and calls for new elections?  And of course where the legislature would have a maximum amount of time it could serve?

I wonder if that would be constitutional.

Sorry corrected it.  It would not be a stretch.

There are some "weak Governors" out there, whose executive powers are curtailed.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.