I also don't understand where is this ridiculous under-perform Obama thing is coming.Stupid logic. Obama's black votes are going entirely to Clinton, Obama won overall by 100+ Delegates & Obama did have significant Dem Support.
I did not see any results from MN or CO showing a Sanders win - The last 2 caucuses Sanders lost despite having a good chance of victory. MA Polls - Clinton was leading 5-7% in most polls recently conducted.
I was certainly surprised by almost 20% victory in MN, CO & 10 points in OK. Sanders significantly out-performed in CO, OK, MN but I think Alabama was a disaster & Texas-Virginia, etc should have been a bit better & would have given him 30 odd delegates (60 swing possibly).
Hillary did better in the Confederacy than expected but this is VERY BAD NEWS for the general as all these states will be Red States for sure.
So far, Hillary has won 3 swing states (VA/IA/NV) and Bernie has won 2 (NH/CO). Really not sure where this talking point comes from.
Battle-ground states
MN - Bernie winning around 23% Now
COLO - Bernie winning around 19% NOW
NH - Bernie wins 22%
Iowa - Hillary won by 0.2%
Nevada - Hillary winning by 5.5%
Looking at this, it does not seem Hillary is doing very well is Swing States
Minnesota isn't a swing state.
And you conveniently forgot Virginia where your idol got his ass kicked.
Minnesota is - 5 out of the 8 Districts in the House is the Reps. In the general the Dems have got from 47 to 52 % Votes - It has always been a narrow victory & could flip anytime with a strong candidate.
Virginia is a swing yes, you are right!
Incorrect. Minnesota has three Republican Reps, not five. Emmer, Paulsen and Kline.
