Safe Republican States (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 04:06:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Safe Republican States (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Safe Republican States  (Read 4497 times)
Pessimistic Antineutrino
Pessimistic Antineutrino
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,896
United States


« on: September 06, 2013, 12:27:02 PM »



I decided against including states like Texas and South Carolina that could trend D in the future. I also did not include the Dakotas as Obama came within 10% in 2008, and do elect a lot of Democrats down-ticket.

50% saturation means it is safe now, 30% means that it is not safe but will likely be safe within the next decade or so.
Logged
Pessimistic Antineutrino
Pessimistic Antineutrino
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,896
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2013, 09:53:33 PM »


These are the states that I think are fairly safe for Republicans for at least the next decade or so in a generic election.  The darker blues are the ones that they should have to put almost no effort to win and the light blues are the ones they'll probably need to pay just a little attention to just to be on the safe side.  This is probably the base that Republican strategists start off with at the beginning of every election cycle.

Agreed except I would make Mississippi darker (it is safer than it looks) and switch Georgia with Indiana.
Logged
Pessimistic Antineutrino
Pessimistic Antineutrino
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,896
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2013, 10:07:25 PM »

Ah I see. I know the oil industry in North Dakota is a big factor in its Republican Lean. I'm fairly sure energy is a factor with Alaska as well.

The Mormon populations are clearly a massive factor in Utah and Idaho, probably because of the socons in the Republican Party. The two states aren't really as conservative as they look-a Democrat held a House seat in Idaho for a term from 2009-2011, and of course we all know about Jim Matheson, holding on narrowly in an R+16 district.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 10 queries.