While I, too, find the use of images of aborted babies disturbing and counterproductive, I do find it hilarious when Pro Choicers complain about "grisly" images. That must take a lot of balls.
In what sense?
I would oppose someone flying around over my town dragging a giant photograph of a woman being raped in Darfur, even though I think it's a very bad thing indeed.
You wouldn't last long in a NYC art exhibition then.
But all of this is so "old hat" and retrogressive now. I want something different and new, not this old junk.
