Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 27,547
![](./avatars/Independent/I_NY.gif)
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« on: January 08, 2010, 12:00:19 AM » |
|
I'm not exactly familiar with the entirety of the Voting Rights Act, but what I do remember doesn't support this conclusion via the statute one bit.
This is actually kind of interesting because last year's major Voting Rights Act case (the name of the case escapes me) dealing with the "preclearance" portion of Section 5 was essentially one big warning to Congress - change the Act in the next few years or we'll strike it down.
|