20-Sep-2004: Judgment Day for CBS (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 07:31:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  20-Sep-2004: Judgment Day for CBS (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 20-Sep-2004: Judgment Day for CBS  (Read 5085 times)
J-Mann
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,189
United States


« on: September 20, 2004, 01:50:53 AM »

The format really is the heart of the story, regardless of CBS attempts to steer us otherwise.  They're trying to get us to believe a story that was presented with false evidence.  If they continue to pursue Bush's Guard records, it's very obvious that they're trying to cover their own mistake.  They should drop it: we're all tired of hearing about 1968-1972.  

Here's why I focus on the format: If an archaeologist told me that he'd found the lost histories of the Emperor Claudius, I'd be tremendously excited. If he presented me with those histories, and they were scribbled on the back of a child's menu from Sirloin Stockade, I would instantly lose faith in the content of what was written. The format would have told me that the content was junk. Likewise, the forged format of the CBS documents precludes us from focusing on any potential content.

Besides, questions about Bush's service have been floating around for years now.  Don't you think we've all made up our minds to either support or oppose him already?  Dan Rather-biased digging up an old story isn't going to change my vote.
Logged
J-Mann
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,189
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2004, 02:06:42 AM »

The format really is the heart of the story, regardless of CBS attempts to steer us otherwise.  They're trying to get us to believe a story that was presented with false evidence.  If they continue to pursue Bush's Guard records, it's very obvious that they're trying to cover their own mistake.  They should drop it: we're all tired of hearing about 1968-1972.  

Here's why I focus on the format: If an archaeologist told me that he'd found the lost histories of the Emperor Claudius, I'd be tremendously excited. If he presented me with those histories, and they were scribbled on the back of a child's menu from Sirloin Stockade, I would instantly lose faith in the content of what was written. The format would have told me that the content was junk. Likewise, the forged format of the CBS documents precludes us from focusing on any potential content.

Besides, questions about Bush's service have been floating around for years now.  Don't you think we've all made up our minds to either support or oppose him already?  Dan Rather-biased digging up an old story isn't going to change my vote.

But what if Claudius' secretary said the information was accurate? i

If she wasn't senile by now, I'd think about it...
Logged
J-Mann
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,189
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2004, 02:14:36 AM »


The only “news” is that someone, with contacts to the Kerry Campaign, committed a felony by forging government documents.  That forgery was used  by a major network in an attempt to bring down the office of the President of the United States during a time of war.  


Exactly.  Bush's service in the Guard isn't a new story, nor was it all that damning, anyway.  If it's proven that CBS was a knowing contributor to attempts to influence an election, THAT's a big story.

And anyway, Claudius didn't have a secretary...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.