Could every Republican/Libertarian stop pretending, please, that Paul would have the slightest chance in New Hampshire? Sheezus man...
Oh yes, because the leading state in the Libertarian movement wouldn't even think about voting for the new leader of the Libertarian wing of the GOP. Don't believe that one poll where he was leading Hillary there, guys!
What percentage of the vote do you think that the Free State Movement has a hold on?
The populous there in general has a libertarian stint to it.
That doesn't mean they'll just fall in line for anyone who appears to have libertarian leanings, it just means that Paul would do marginally better than other Republicans.
Ron Paul, libertarian hero, didn't even win the Republican primary there.
