Americans' View on Abortion Consistently Contradictory (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 09:54:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Americans' View on Abortion Consistently Contradictory (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Americans' View on Abortion Consistently Contradictory  (Read 3248 times)
DanielX
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70

« on: March 12, 2006, 07:30:53 PM »

I think most believe that overturning Roe vs. Wade would mean automatic outlawing of most abortions, and that's why a majority doesn't support overturning it.

Why wouldn't the overturning of Roe V Wade mean the outlawing of abortion?  There are Republican majorities in both houses of congress, and a Republican president.  I think it is reasonable to assume they would make it illegal.

Because any overturning of Roe v. Wade would leave abortion in its pre-1972 state, in which individual states determined its fate. It was legal in several states, including California, before 1972; presumably different states will have different laws.
Logged
DanielX
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70

« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2006, 08:02:44 PM »

I think most believe that overturning Roe vs. Wade would mean automatic outlawing of most abortions, and that's why a majority doesn't support overturning it.

Why wouldn't the overturning of Roe V Wade mean the outlawing of abortion?  There are Republican majorities in both houses of congress, and a Republican president.  I think it is reasonable to assume they would make it illegal.

Because any overturning of Roe v. Wade would leave abortion in its pre-1972 state, in which individual states determined its fate. It was legal in several states, including California, before 1972; presumably different states will have different laws.

It was legal in Utah as well, interestingly enough.

If Roe vs Wade was overturned and it once again became a matter for the states to decide, which I happen to agree with, would pre-1972 state laws be valid?

Dave

Probably at least at first, until new laws are passed. It might depend on how Roe V. Wade is overturned, though. Ask Emsworth, he's more in the know legalistically then I am.
Logged
DanielX
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70

« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2006, 08:59:12 AM »


No, I'm saying the Republicans in congress and the president would simply pass a national ban.

Not likely - that would be political suicide. The best way for the Republicans to lose support in more libertarian areas like the Southwest and far Northeast would be to bypass local authority on moral issues. Besides which, the Supreme Court may rule that it isn't a federal responsibility - thus making such a ban unconstitutional.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 10 queries.