Why does Hillary Clinton tend to under-perform expectations? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 17, 2024, 12:19:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Why does Hillary Clinton tend to under-perform expectations? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why does Hillary Clinton tend to under-perform expectations?  (Read 1546 times)
JRP1994
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,048


« on: March 27, 2016, 03:19:14 PM »

In 2007, Clinton was widely seen as the frontrunner to clinch the Democratic nomination with relative ease. Not a runaway frontrunner, but a clear one. What happened? She got outmaneuvered, outflanked, and flat-out outdone by Barack Obama.

In 2015, Clinton was seen as a massive frontrunner to perhaps sweep all 50 states in the primary and win the general election with relative ease. While she's very likely to be the Democratic nominee this time (sorry to those feeling the Bern), she's having difficulty putting away a 75 year old self-identified socialist. He's won over 1,000 delegates and 15 states.

My question is, why does Clinton have difficulty living up to expectations in an electoral sense? Is it because people set expectations too high? Do late-deciders break against her?  Is she a poorer candidate than people credit her?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.