I Cant Believe I'm Writing This, But: "In Defense of Phil Robertson"

[JRP1994]

The developments today regarding the removal of Phil Robertson from A&E's "Duck Dynasty" after Robertson's comments on homosexuality have prompted me to briefly articulate my thoughts on the matter.

The United States of America was founded on the notion that all men are created equal, and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights. To further safeguard these rights against the threat of an oppressive government, the Founding Fathers enshrined some of our most sacred liberties into the Bill of Rights. Highlighted in the First Amendment is the invaluable freedom of speech - the right of each and every man and woman to speak his/her thoughts in public, without fear of punishment. While the Supreme Court has clarified some logically necessary boundaries on this, the over-riding principle of the First Amendment remains the same -- the assurance of the right to speak one's mind on controversial and unpopular subjects. 

A&E's decision to remove Phil Robertson from "Duck Dynasty" deeply troubles me, not because I necessarily agree with Robertson's comments regarding homosexuality, but because his removal highlights a fundamental hypocrisy on the part of much of American media. Near limitless leeway is granted, in terms of tolerance and acceptance, for those whose views align with popular sentiment, and whose speech is confined to the politically correct vernacular. Phil Robertson is facing vicious attacks, largely, from those who often speak in favor of tolerance, diversity of opinion, and freedom of expression. Is this the mark of a civilized society? I think not.

Do I watch "Duck Dynasty"? No. Do I agree with Phil Robertson's comparison of homosexuals to adulterers, drunks, and swindlers? No, and I find the comment offensive. However, the Constitution does not grant anyone the right to not be offended. Because I dearly value the right to articulate my beliefs, I will not shy away from defending Phil Robertson's right to speak his mind and express his faith, even though I may disagree with what he chooses to say. In the words of Evelyn Beatrice Hall, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

I hope A&E will reconsider their position on this issue.