Who would have won 2000 under different election systems? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 06:17:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Who would have won 2000 under different election systems? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Who would have won 2000 under different election systems?  (Read 36405 times)
Cairo_East
Cairo_Eastq
Rookie
**
Posts: 24


« on: December 13, 2003, 06:02:04 PM »

I say we use the BCS to decide the presidency. Wink
Logged
Cairo_East
Cairo_Eastq
Rookie
**
Posts: 24


« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2003, 11:25:27 AM »
« Edited: December 14, 2003, 11:31:44 AM by Cairo_East »

Sorry to cause confusion in my vain attempt at humor.

To say it's very controversial is accurate.  We'd probably have elected John Hagelin with that system.


I all honesty, I think the electoral college works well.  It has worked, at worst, to 93% accuracy in the past 57 elections.  Any changes to the system would be criticized so much that the underpinnings of American democracy would be compromised.  

I'm not happy with the results of the 2000 election, but if the Democrats weren't so aimless in 2000 this wouldn't have been an issue.  It's also a tradeoff from the sketchy Kennedy-Nixon results in 1960.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.