America's debt-to-GDP ratio isn't as bad as its citizens' (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 01:00:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  America's debt-to-GDP ratio isn't as bad as its citizens' (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: America's debt-to-GDP ratio isn't as bad as its citizens'  (Read 2650 times)
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,684
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

« on: January 21, 2013, 05:18:23 PM »
« edited: January 21, 2013, 05:36:55 PM by jaichind »

I live in Greater NYC region.  I reject the arugment that $483K a year means living well.  It takes well more then that after one takes into account of high cost of living, saving for retirement and massive housing costs.  If said household managed to buy a condo back in the 1990s then I would agree that $483K would be living well.  So many of my friends in households above $500K in NYC are really streached trying to buy a condo /co-op for the right size and in a good school district.  What they have to go through to be in a good school district and the interviews they have to go through just for reasonable nusury school is a sad testiment how bad the system has become in NYC.  I live in the NYC suburbs which is better but still the cost of good housing in good school district is massive.  I guess this link is saying $483K after taxes so not all my friends would meet that threshold but many of them including myself are in that catagory (above $483K after taxes) and none of us would say we are "living well."   All of them, including myself, realize we make a lot compared to many in the country and we are all grateful for that, but living well or affluent we are not.

Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,684
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2013, 05:20:24 PM »

Actually the US federal government has massive amount of assets (mostly property) which if sold can easily pay off its debts. 


Right, thats why the private sector has a nominally positive net asset value while the public sector has a massively negative one. The public sector technically has very few assets. But the main asset of government (ability to tax going forward, ability to change laws, etc) is not really considered in these calculations.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.