Ed Kilgore to Dems: Please don't nominate someone older than Trump (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 11:00:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Ed Kilgore to Dems: Please don't nominate someone older than Trump (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Ed Kilgore to Dems: Please don't nominate someone older than Trump  (Read 1298 times)
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


« on: October 23, 2017, 02:36:55 AM »

The youngest potential candidates; Zuckerberg, Booker, Castro, are all god-awful.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2017, 03:04:50 AM »

The youngest potential candidates; Zuckerberg, Booker, Castro, are all god-awful.

How about Tim Ryan or Joe Kennedy? At least for VP.

Ryan is an ok VP pick for somebody. Joe Kennedy sucks, and people really only like the Kennedy's that got shot. The rest of the family is awful.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2017, 01:38:58 PM »

The youngest potential candidates; Zuckerberg, Booker, Castro, are all god-awful.

Garcetti and Murphy are younger than Booker, as are the House crew (Gabbard, Moulton, Ryan).  In any case, I think the point here wasn't that you should go as young as possible, just that you should think carefully about picking someone who's way at the other end of the age spectrum.


Garcetti would rather spend billions on the Olympics than housing for his cities massive homeless population. F**k 'em.

Murphy is okay but is the most boring Generic D candidate possible.

Gabbard has god-awful ties to things like the BJP

Seth Moulton? F***************************K no.


It's not that 'IT HAS TO BE BERNIE REEEEEE", it's that the drop in quality after you get past Bernie is so massive.

Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2017, 12:44:43 AM »

The youngest potential candidates; Zuckerberg, Booker, Castro, are all god-awful.

Garcetti and Murphy are younger than Booker, as are the House crew (Gabbard, Moulton, Ryan).  In any case, I think the point here wasn't that you should go as young as possible, just that you should think carefully about picking someone who's way at the other end of the age spectrum.


Garcetti would rather spend billions on the Olympics than housing for his cities massive homeless population. F**k 'em.
The LA Olympics could very well be profitable, and are very well thought out. The city government can't spend it's way out of homelessness anyway. Garcetti is amazing.


The Olympics have been a money hole for every city that's had them, hence why the only people that usually try to attract the god-awful spectacle are 2nd-world, bribery-rampant despot-states like Russia and Brazil.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.