Washington Post: Physical Evidence Supports Wilson's Account of Brown Shooting (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 09:51:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Washington Post: Physical Evidence Supports Wilson's Account of Brown Shooting (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Washington Post: Physical Evidence Supports Wilson's Account of Brown Shooting  (Read 1586 times)
CountryClassSF
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,530


« on: November 30, 2014, 06:00:36 PM »

Normally, an open-shut self defense case like this wouldn't make a grand jury.  It's true that grand juries indict "ham sandwiches", but that is because 999 times out of 1,000, a DA is not going to bring a case to a grand jury unless he is actively seeking an indictment AND he believes that he can meet a reasonable doubt standard with a petit jury.

Many on the left are ill-informed in this regard.  The DA in STL County, McColluch, a Democrat by the way, should be lauded for his transparency and unprecedented lengths he went to to ensure the grand jury had access to all of the facts. 

Note that McColluch could have unilaterally decided that he was not going to take the case to a grand jury, and refuse to file an information.  He chose instead to present the case to a grand jury that was already beginning its service.  They had a choice of multiple charges from Murder-1 all the way down to involuntary manslaughter. They returned a no bill on all of them.

Yet, its interesting that McColluch is essentially being attacked for providing the grand jury with all of the facts and letting them decide.  They would have rather he had not done that so that the grand jury *would* indict? Sorry, but if this case cannot meet a probable cause standard, it certainly can't meet a reasonable doubt standard in a court of law.

Many on the left would typically support this kind of transparency on the part of prosecutors, but it appears some TV commentators are grossly uninformed.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.