Standard 435 fair map in progress (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 03:17:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Standard 435 fair map in progress (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Standard 435 fair map in progress  (Read 1035 times)
palandio
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,028


« on: November 27, 2018, 04:31:32 PM »

> Is a fair map
> Draws Maine East-West

Okay then -_-

Population densities should be taken into account when determining if a map is East-West, North-South etc.

Cumberland and York County already account for ca. 70% of a district anchored in the South-West.

The current map adds Sagadahoc, Lincoln, Knox and a majority of Kennebec.

Solid's map adds Androscoggin, Oxford and Franklin.

In my opinion there is no excuse for a good compact map not to add Androscoggin, if you at the same time add a majority of Kennebec. I mean you could argue for a coastal district including Sagadahoc, Lincoln, Knox, Wado and parts of Hancock; but not Kennebec.

If you add Androscoggin, a very nice compact South-Western district would also include Sagadahoc and a majority of Oxford. This would look quite differently from Solid's district, but the only difference is switching Sagadahoc for Franklin and the rest of Oxford. Sagadahoc accounts for only 5% of a district. So in many regards these are essentially the same districts, the difference being that Solid's plan doesn't split any counties at all.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 11 queries.