Jeb's In (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 02:29:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Jeb's In (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Jeb's In  (Read 7394 times)
dudeabides
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,375
Tuvalu
« on: June 06, 2015, 02:09:37 PM »


In the end, this Republican nomination is probably going to come down to two individuals: Former Governor of Florida Jeb Bush and Governor of Wisconsin Scott Walker. Jeb Bush, by far, is the most accomplished Governor in the field, he also has experience in the private sector, and he has the knowledge of a wide variety of issues. He is the best prepared to be President. Scott Walker has done some great things in Wisconsin and has proved his critics wrong time and time again

 Consider the opposition:

1- Bobby Jindal - Bobby Jindal has been a great Governor of Louisiana, but with low approval ratings at home and a lack of communication skills in the digital era, Jindal is unlikely to be a front-runner.
2- Mike Huckabee - Huckabee's 2008 bid took him further than anyone expected. Many liked him as a talk show host, and he is universally liked, but his record in Arkansas on crime and some of his beliefs on social issues put him outside of the mainstream of Republican thought, or would cost the GOP a general election
3- Rick Santorum - Santorum did well in 2012 only because Huckabee's '08 voters had no place to go, but in the end, Santorum is socially conservative, but more moderate on economic issues, and to most voters both in the GOP and the general election, there is little room for that kind of candidate.
4 - George Pataki - Pataki is pro-choice, signed some of the toughest gun laws in the nation into law, and is taking credit for reducing crime in New York, when it was really Rudy Giuliani's huge reductions in crime thanks to his, and not Pataki's, policies that reduced crime. Pataki is too moderate for the Republican Party.
5 - Chris Christie - For two decades, New Jersey has seen higher taxes and jobs leaving the state as a result. Chris Christie had a chance to do something, and while he did some things well during his first term, he has signed BILLIONS in corporate welfare during his second term, and has been completely irresponsible with taxpayer dollars - between signing into law the Dream Act, expanding medicaid under Obamacare, and hiring a law firm to do it's own "investigation" into his role in "Bridgegate." New Jersey has seen it's credit downgraded 8 times since 2010.
6 - Marco Rubio - Senator Rubio has more baggage than most, and people who might support him are now with Governor Bush in this campaign.
7 - Ben Carson - Ben Carson has no experience in elected office, has compared Obamacare to slavery, has said the U.S. is becoming like Germany in WW2, and has said the second amendment doesn't apply to people living in cities. He needs a history lesson and some experience.
8 - Rand Paul - Rand Paul, on foreign policy, is a liberal who opposes the Patriot Act, opposed sanctions against Iran, and wants to be somewhat isolated from the rest of the world. There's a reason he's having fundraising problem, there is a reason his poll numbers are way down - it's because he's soft on national security and crime.
9 - Ted Cruz - We've had a President who gave a good speech but had no record of accomplishment. Why would we want the same thing, just of another party?
10 - Donald Trump - The king of corporate welfare detests open markets and a strong national defense, the only thing he doesn't detest is himself - he's a progressive and an egomaniac.
11 - Lindsey Graham - He might be right on SOME foreign policy issues, but he's basically a younger version of John McCain.
12 - Carly Fiorina - Smart, articulate, and probably electable - but where is she on the issues?
13 - John Kasich - Yawn
14 - Rick Perry - The economic growth in Texas started before he was Governor, and I don't think Republicans want a nominee who is for open borders. 
Logged
dudeabides
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,375
Tuvalu
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2015, 03:29:02 PM »

Odds on Bush making a Magna Carta reference on its 800th anniversary?  I'd do it if I were him; it would immediately set himself up as the natural anti-monarchist candidate to take down Obama/Clinton big government. It's not a fresh tactic, but, as just mentioned, he's just one of only a few viable candidates, and the other two (Walker and Christie) haven't declared yet.

As for his general viability, his nomination punts the greatest advantage the Republicans have in this election--dynastic fatigue.  Sure, he'll rally the red states, but the last two elections showed us that wasn't enough.  He'll try to pry open the Democrats' grip on Latinos, but while that might make the difference in his state of Florida, I don't see it making the difference anywhere else.

The Republican way to victory is through Christie, Walker, or a surprise mid-tier candidate catching lightning.

Chris Christie more electable than Jeb Bush?

How do you figure? In their re-election bids as Governors, both Bush and Christie made inroads with those who generally support Democrats - Hispanics, blacks, women, younger voters. The difference is, Bush didn't have to rely on incumbency for such support, he made those inroads in his first run for Governor - Christie did not. Also, Bush cut taxes, increased Florida's rainy day fund, presided over a credit upgrade for his state, enacted medical liability reform, and fought for sweeping education reform with choice and accountability. While Christie made some strides in the area of education, his state has seen 8 credit downgrades, record corporate welfare, higher property taxes, and sluggish job growth, contrary to Bush presiding over an era in which 16% of the jobs created in the entire country where created in Florida during his eight years.

You then look at what they are saying now. Jeb Bush's message is expanded economic growth and opportunity for all Americans, it's an inclusive message. Chris Christie is talking about strong leadership - but he has not shown such leadership as a Governor. When you press both men on issues, Bush is far more articulate and knowledgeable on the issues than Christie. Whereas Bush ran for Governor of Florida in 1998 and 2002 as a conservative, Chris Christie ran in both 2009 and 2013 as a moderate - now, running for President, Bush is sticking to his positions while Christie is flip-flopping in an attempt to win over conservative voters.

Bottom line: Bush's message is inclusive, his record is one he can run on, and he can reach out to those who don't generally support Republicans, Chris Christie is trying too hard to define himself as a conservative, when he has never run as or governed as one. In a general election, Bush's strategy is far more successful - it's the same strategy employed by George W. Bush in 2000.

Now, there is an argument to be made that Governor Walker is more electable than Governor Bush. Walker is a fresh face, he's won in a blue state, and he has appeal to working class voters. But, Scott Walker has never had to win over a significant number of latino voters critical to winning a national election. Also, on immigration policy, right to work, and farm subsidies, Walker is switching positions. I don't think Governor Walker has what it takes to make inroads with latino voters, which makes him less electable than Jeb Bush.
Logged
dudeabides
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,375
Tuvalu
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2015, 12:24:23 PM »

http://politickernj.com/2015/06/jebs-major-advantage-the-gravitas-factor/

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 13 queries.