Was Dewey considered some sacraficial lamb in 1944? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 10:27:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Was Dewey considered some sacraficial lamb in 1944? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Was Dewey considered some sacraficial lamb in 1944?  (Read 1324 times)
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,817
United States


« on: June 16, 2020, 11:11:33 PM »

Given FDR's health in 1944, he probably was beatable, but it just would have taken a very special candidate.

Dewey had some major problems as a campaigner, which were exposed in 1948.

FDR really was only unbeatable in 1936 and maybe 1940 (though that third term is a pesky thing...if World War II wasn't in progress, I'd argue Wilikie probably could have beaten him on that alone.)
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,817
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2020, 12:44:23 PM »

Given FDR's health in 1944, he probably was beatable, but it just would have taken a very special candidate.

Dewey had some major problems as a campaigner, which were exposed in 1948.

FDR really was only unbeatable in 1936 and maybe 1940 (though that third term is a pesky thing...if World War II wasn't in progress, I'd argue Wilikie probably could have beaten him on that alone.)

I actually think he was more unbeatable in 1932 than 1940. Hoover was DOA that year.

Hoover was DOA, but FDR easily could have not been the Democratic nominee for President.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.